<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The four phases of mind mapping</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mindmappingsoftwareblog.com/the-four-phases-of-mind-mapping/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mindmappingsoftwareblog.com/the-four-phases-of-mind-mapping/</link>
	<description>Your best resource for advice on mind mapping software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 06:42:01 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nick Duffill</title>
		<link>http://mindmappingsoftwareblog.com/the-four-phases-of-mind-mapping/comment-page-1/#comment-390</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Duffill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 10:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindmappingsoftwareblog.com/the-four-phases-of-mind-mapping/#comment-390</guid>
		<description>Chuck
Thanks for raising this interesting subject. I don&#039;t agree with this model. Rather than fill your page, I posted a response at http://duffill.blogs.com/beyond_crayons/2008/07/response-to-peter-abrahams-four-generations-article.html
Nick Duffill</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chuck<br />
Thanks for raising this interesting subject. I don&#8217;t agree with this model. Rather than fill your page, I posted a response at <a href="http://duffill.blogs.com/beyond_crayons/2008/07/response-to-peter-abrahams-four-generations-article.html" rel="nofollow">http://duffill.blogs.com/beyond_crayons/2008/07/response-to-peter-abrahams-four-generations-article.html</a><br />
Nick Duffill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edwin Yip (Developer of Mind Mapping Software MindVisualizer)</title>
		<link>http://mindmappingsoftwareblog.com/the-four-phases-of-mind-mapping/comment-page-1/#comment-389</link>
		<dc:creator>Edwin Yip (Developer of Mind Mapping Software MindVisualizer)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 03:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindmappingsoftwareblog.com/the-four-phases-of-mind-mapping/#comment-389</guid>
		<description>So what the fifth generation will be?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what the fifth generation will be?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Argey</title>
		<link>http://mindmappingsoftwareblog.com/the-four-phases-of-mind-mapping/comment-page-1/#comment-388</link>
		<dc:creator>Argey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 02:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindmappingsoftwareblog.com/the-four-phases-of-mind-mapping/#comment-388</guid>
		<description>&quot;. . . folding trees where nothing can be found&quot; - Ah! James, I had to rise to that one, because visibility was my main reason for developing 3D Topicscape where 3D landscapes and zooming offer views of large collections of informatiuon without having topics hidden in collapsed branches.

Chuck, I agree with the &#039;four somethings&#039;, but not four &#039;generations&#039;.  I think it refects reality much better to consider it &quot;the four forks of mind mapping&quot;.  All four uses still have their place in different circumstances:
- My eight-year old is making handrawn mind maps of natural phenomena in his inquiry class.  It&#039;s not necessary to push him to a computer keyboard for that.  In fact I think it would inhibit him and his classmates on the same table.
- I use a desktop mind mapping program when planning articles where no collaboration is needed.  I don&#039;t need a web connection for that.
- I used 2D mind maps for managing projects and information and now I&#039;m using 3D ones for the same thing.
- And when I&#039;m working with clients who are sypmathetic to mind maps, we use a collaborative platform. That&#039;s always with the limitation that we&#039;re not working on confidential material that they don&#039;t trust on someone else&#039;s server.

To me, &#039;generations&#039; implies that we&#039;ve moved on and left earlier uses behind.  Although we&#039;ve moved on, in the sense that things have become possible that previously were not, it&#039;s been an _expansion_ of possible uses, not &quot;Let&#039;s abandon that because now we can do this.&quot;

Argey
project manager http://www.topicscape.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;. . . folding trees where nothing can be found&#8221; &#8211; Ah! James, I had to rise to that one, because visibility was my main reason for developing 3D Topicscape where 3D landscapes and zooming offer views of large collections of informatiuon without having topics hidden in collapsed branches.</p>
<p>Chuck, I agree with the &#8216;four somethings&#8217;, but not four &#8216;generations&#8217;.  I think it refects reality much better to consider it &#8220;the four forks of mind mapping&#8221;.  All four uses still have their place in different circumstances:<br />
- My eight-year old is making handrawn mind maps of natural phenomena in his inquiry class.  It&#8217;s not necessary to push him to a computer keyboard for that.  In fact I think it would inhibit him and his classmates on the same table.<br />
- I use a desktop mind mapping program when planning articles where no collaboration is needed.  I don&#8217;t need a web connection for that.<br />
- I used 2D mind maps for managing projects and information and now I&#8217;m using 3D ones for the same thing.<br />
- And when I&#8217;m working with clients who are sypmathetic to mind maps, we use a collaborative platform. That&#8217;s always with the limitation that we&#8217;re not working on confidential material that they don&#8217;t trust on someone else&#8217;s server.</p>
<p>To me, &#8216;generations&#8217; implies that we&#8217;ve moved on and left earlier uses behind.  Although we&#8217;ve moved on, in the sense that things have become possible that previously were not, it&#8217;s been an _expansion_ of possible uses, not &#8220;Let&#8217;s abandon that because now we can do this.&#8221;</p>
<p>Argey<br />
project manager <a href="http://www.topicscape.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.topicscape.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James uk</title>
		<link>http://mindmappingsoftwareblog.com/the-four-phases-of-mind-mapping/comment-page-1/#comment-387</link>
		<dc:creator>James uk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 16:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindmappingsoftwareblog.com/the-four-phases-of-mind-mapping/#comment-387</guid>
		<description>Maybe the next phase is where the mindmap becomes a new windows / or other operating system interface as in the brain program but more than just an application - a complete knowledge management array /system which is at last a useable and intuitive visual interface rather than folder trees, where nothing can be found?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe the next phase is where the mindmap becomes a new windows / or other operating system interface as in the brain program but more than just an application &#8211; a complete knowledge management array /system which is at last a useable and intuitive visual interface rather than folder trees, where nothing can be found?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
