Last week, I posted a prediction that mind mapping software will hit an “inflection point” in 2009 that will result in substantial growth, and that this technology will finally enter the mainstream of business.
This post has generated a record number of comments, and they continue to roll in. Commenters have generally agreed with my assertion, but there have also been some people who have highlighted some compelling reasons why this WON’T happen. It’s been a lively debate, and I encourage you to check it out and add your opinions to the mix.
As a next step, I decided to ask the developers of mind mapping software to comment on this prediction. They are closer to the actual users than most of us, which puts them in an ideal position to see the future direction of this software niche.
Here’s what they had to say:
Mind mapping, as a technique, is relatively unknown in the business world outside of a handful of countries like Germany, where it is taught in schools. Until now, it has been difficult for mind mapping enthusiasts to get the word out on the technique and many information workers remain unaware of the technology and its benefits. Mind mapping software tends to enter businesses through individual enthusiasts rather than through the IT department.
The primary way that someone learns about mind mapping is to observe a business associate who is using a mind mapping application to accomplish a specific task. What’s more, in the past, the only way for a business user to share their maps with others was to send a static PDF or “reader” version of their map, requiring the recipient to download a compromised application in order to interact with the file or view a flat image of a mind map.
Now, mind mapping software manufacturers are making the experience of an information map much more readily available to non-users with things like the “Mindjet Player” that allows map producers to send fully interactive maps embedded in a PDF file that gives anyone the multi-dimensional experience of working in a map. In addition, with the expansion of online mapping, people are able to collaborate remotely around a mind map with an experienced mapper in the driver seat giving non-mappers live exposure to the actual mapping process anytime, anywhere.
For the last 10-15 years, business users believed they had enough productivity tools. In fact, most of them believe they have too much unused productivity technology at their disposal. Now, with business environments getting more and more competitive and access to information creating even more stress, people are once more looking for a better way of doing things. People in information-intensive professions like project management, sales and marketing, IT, web development, and other areas are looking for ways to make themselves stand out and be more competitive.
However, just seeing mind mapping technology in action is not enough to convince most people to take the necessary steps to change the way they work every day. It must be viewed as relevant and useful to the task at hand. More and more companies are using the technique as a central tool for project management, sales force enablement, of repetitive consulting s, strategic planning and more.
As the technique becomes more and more embedded in mission critical business applications, not only will individuals gain more exposure to the technology, but the technology will become a mandatory tool for success of work groups.
— Neil Mendelson, VP of Development, Mindjet
It totally depends on your definition of mainstream – if mainstream means that more than 50% of the population access and use mind mapping techniques on a daily basis, then the answer is a categorical No Chance!
For mapping to go mainstream it requires a significant change in human behavior and in doing so break the (bad) habits of a lifetime – the adage of teaching an old dog new tricks comes to mind!
Don’t get me wrong. You will always get exceptions to the rule, but in my opinion we are a generation away from mapping being truly mainstream. Sorry to burst the bubble, but ultimately I am a realistic Scot!
That does not mean to say that growth in mapping cannot be significant in 2009 and the years ahead – I genuinely believe it can, but it won’t happen simply by developers pouring additional gimmicks, bells and whistles into their applications (although that will always appeal to a small minority).
The bottom line is that mapping will go mainstream when a significant number of senior people within organizations (say 20%) recognize that the results they achieve by using mapping techniques (as individuals and as teams) far outweigh anything done previously. This improvement must be attributed directly to the use of mapping techniques across their business. It’s simple in concept. It’s just the that is a bit challenging!
Mapping lets you do things that were not practical before – drawing comparisons around successful outcomes is a no brainer!
I genuinely believe you have a role to play in making mapping mainstream, but focusing on functionality is not going to impress beyond the early adopters or the gadget chasers. Instead I believe we need a body of people conveying at every opportunity the outstanding business results that can be achieved through mapping techniques. The emphasis has to change.
You will notice I have dropped any reference to mind mapping in my discussion – it is deliberate, it is dated, it carries too much baggage and doesn’t really represent our industry at all. What can be achieved using mapping tools these days far outweighs ANYTHING associated with a sheet of paper and 4 colored pens!
— Donald Maciver, General Manager, MindGenius
Definitely 2009 will be a critical year. I’ll approach it from 2 points.
From the mind mapping software developer’s point of view, our software is becoming more than just a mind map software. We have mainstream features built into our MindMapper software, such as MS Office integration, project management and Gantt charts, Internet search, etc. We can also “draw” so many different types of diagrams than just the traditional mind maps, so users will be able to easily adopt MindMapper into their every day usage.
From the user’s point of view, mind maps are gaining awareness more than ever before. And now the products in the market are mature enough to satisfy a wide spectrum of mind map users, from novices to mind map professionals.
— Patrick Koh, MindMapper USA
I would argue that it has entered the mainstream already. Ten years ago no one knew what mind mapping was, today it has entered the business vernacular. We hear customers say to us all of the time I need to map out what I am doing. Maps are used everywhere now. I do not think that you could visit a single company that is over 2,000 people and not find mind mapping used. When we visit customers we see maps printed hanging on the walls, we see maps written out on whiteboards in conference rooms. Mapping is in the here and now, it is not just some futuristic maybe in ten year idea.
What I think we will see more of in 2009 is the benefits that come from people mind mapping. The ability for people to get the 10,000-meter view of what is important to them. Few other tools can deliver this macro view in such clarity. There will be more discovery in 2009 because of the mind map’s ability to present this. I see that mind mapping will have a big effect on non-technology oriented companies as they look to implement best practices in 2009.
— Matt Lewis, CS Odessa (developer of ConceptDraw MINDMAP)
If you have an opinion on the future direction of mind mapping software and its adoption by business, please share it in the comments area below.
Wallace Tait · 845 weeks ago
I would say most developers have created excellent visual mapping products to enable data, process, information, knowledge and system improvement. Most of the products available to date have quite literally changed the way many within academia and businesses create, manage and exchange information.
If developers are using the term mind mapping, it begs the question; are you in the mind mapping business or the information management business?
Donald Maciver, the General Manager of Mind Genius based in Scotland is quoted as saying; “For mapping to go mainstream it requires a significant change in human behaviour”.
Agreeing with Donald’s quote, I would suggest a potential approach to enable Visual mapping to experience a mainstream infusion.
During mid 2008, I suggested to my fellow colleagues Arjen Ter Hoeve (Netherlands), Patrick Baker (New Zealand) and Brian Friedlander (USA) of a potential format for taking Visual mapping mainstream.
A free Visual mapping Body of Knowledge (VMBOK) may best serve this purpose. From within a body of knowledge, academic content and relevant knowledge could be extrapolated and compiled for potential future academic use.
So where do the developers fit into this? I believe the developers are integral to the development, and continuous improvement of such a BOK. This is where your organizational contributions to these endeavours can be preserved and realized. It is thus enabling you to continue to develop software with the confidence that a VMBOK delivers a knowledge base of the tools and techniques of visual mapping that represent your agendas.
Visual mapping includes but is not limited to Mind mapping, concept mapping, flow charting, argument mapping and much more, therefore we all have relevancy within a VMBOK.
My colleagues have already taken the initial steps of working together to establish the foundations of a VMBOK and would be extremely interested in your input and feedback regarding this initiative. Your contribution and support, so please connect with us at: info@visualmapper.org
MAINSTREAM CAN HAPPEN IF WE MAKE IT SO.
John England · 845 weeks ago
Is it the use of the word 'Visual' causes some confusion in these discussions? We used to call ourselves (Mindsystems) 'The Visual Thinking Experts' which while true did not really position us in the way we wanted. So what is wrong with the term 'Visual Mapping’? I believe the emphasis, as I have said elsewhere, should be on Information mapping. Many years ago I was involved in a military project on Information Mapping. While this had a difference focus than Visual mapping there are some important parallels. This was before laptops and even desktop computers so the focus was on paper. However to summarise, IM concerned such things as certain types of information always being presented in a prescribed format at a place you would expect it to be. A simple example is an address on a letter. My point is that if we thought of this issue more as an Information Mapping issue than a visual one ... would this make the developers path clearer? In other words if the focus was more on the ‘information’ with the visual aspect being secondary, perhaps some of the mist would clear. Please do not think that I consider the visual aspects unimportant ... they are CRITICAL. If is just that the information should be central and the visual presentation chosen according to the circumstances.
Wallace Tait · 845 weeks ago
Visual mapping though is being more widely used and accepted even in the Mind mapping communities.
Within business, when we use the term mapping, it can mean either flow charting, process or value stream mapping.
Using the term mapping just doesn't do it for me but I can accept it within the context of discussions with fellow Visual mappers.
Process mapping, Information mapping, Knowledge mapping et al; I certainly accept that "Information mapping" is more descriptive and meaningful to the arena that has been created around Visual mapping.
Graphical expressions of information and knowledge certainly has a wide scope.
Good points John.
Wallace Tait · 844 weeks ago
Speaking with a developer colleague, I encouraged him to develop his own organizational BOK. This is indeed the logical thing to do. A developers BOK translates into knowledge capital associated with their product. Further, I would say: Any developer who has or decides to create a BOK that speaks of their existing software offerings, would understand the logic of their BOK being added to a VMBOK.
I firmly believe the VMBOK can be a home for numerous developers BOK's. This would indeed benefit the potential for those who choose to be certified to a VMBOK in the future.
We have Phd, MB and other designations that fulfill the requirements of their respective BOK's, thus I don't see any reason why we can't prepare the future thought leaders (read whole brain thinkers) to be equipped with a recognized certification and designation as being a prepared and able Visual thinker.
Again, this can't happen without the active participation of professional Visual mappers and the mainstream developers. The various BOK's that may act as modules that can be added to the VMBOK, thus enabling the availability of relevant developer information and training, aimed at the continuous improvement and development of VMBOK graduates. The scope is wide and involves many approaches to Visual mapping.
Just my thoughts, but I wish these thoughts to challenge you to connect with us at info@visualmapper.org and become involved.